Comments on: Xajax and Vanilla http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/ Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:46:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ed Robinson http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-272129 Ed Robinson Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:02:33 +0000 http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-272129 I see this is an old blog post but maybe you are still working on your framework. I have used xajax in just about everything web that I do since its first version and couldn't do without it. The project has been at a standstill for some time now but the "beta" of V0.6 is available, is PHP 5 and I find it works fine in my production apps. It drives the entire site at loadsbyjake.com. I have used some jQuery ajax functionallity and find it cumbersome compared to xajax and a bit limiting but that's MHO. I have been working on a framework myself and it uses mostly externals - xajax, jQuery, Smarty, Floatbox and dabl (orm) all of which save me so much time and effort. Have read your routing, dispatching, etc articles. Very nice. Ed I see this is an old blog post but maybe you are still working on your framework.

I have used xajax in just about everything web that I do since its first version and couldn't do without it. The project has been at a standstill for some time now but the "beta" of V0.6 is available, is PHP 5 and I find it works fine in my production apps. It drives the entire site at loadsbyjake.com.

I have used some jQuery ajax functionallity and find it cumbersome compared to xajax and a bit limiting but that's MHO.

I have been working on a framework myself and it uses mostly externals – xajax, jQuery, Smarty, Floatbox and dabl (orm) all of which save me so much time and effort.

Have read your routing, dispatching, etc articles. Very nice.

Ed

]]> By: Doug Hill http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-22713 Doug Hill Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:38:35 +0000 http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-22713 Yep, I've been super busy and away from writing and programming for a lot longer than I intended. I'm back though with lots of new ideas. Stay tuned. Yep, I've been super busy and away from writing and programming for a lot longer than I intended. I'm back though with lots of new ideas. Stay tuned.

]]> By: Dan http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-22703 Dan Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:25:54 +0000 http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-22703 Did ya die? I liked what you were doing with this blog. Looks like you're MIA now though. Did ya die? I liked what you were doing with this blog. Looks like you're MIA now though.

]]> By: Yvonne http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-17492 Yvonne Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:16:35 +0000 http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-17492 Just checking. Just checking.

]]> By: Doug Hill http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-11743 Doug Hill Thu, 15 May 2008 19:26:02 +0000 http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-11743 The xajax replacement is still a work in progress. I definitely understand about the voodoo :). Amazingly though its quite simple to understand whats going on once you dig into the source. Doug The xajax replacement is still a work in progress. I definitely understand about the voodoo :) . Amazingly though its quite simple to understand whats going on once you dig into the source.

Doug

]]> By: PaulG http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-11734 PaulG Thu, 15 May 2008 09:26:28 +0000 http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-11734 Xajax replacement: I too am 'evolving' my own dev framework and used Xajax from the start, and had planned to add moo.fx onto the front end, only because I like its small footprint and I have used it successfully before. Xajax always seems full of stuff I don't need (maybe because I am not proficient enough to use it all or because I just dont need most of it). Consequently it always feels like bit like Voodoo programming when I use it, but, crikey it just works very very well. I am really interested in what you come up with in the way of an Xajax replacement that works with jQuery. PaulG Xajax replacement:

I too am 'evolving' my own dev framework and used Xajax from the start, and had planned to add moo.fx onto the front end, only because I like its small footprint and I have used it successfully before.

Xajax always seems full of stuff I don't need (maybe because I am not proficient enough to use it all or because I just dont need most of it). Consequently it always feels like bit like Voodoo programming when I use it, but, crikey it just works very very well.

I am really interested in what you come up with in the way of an Xajax replacement that works with jQuery.

PaulG

]]>