<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xajax and Vanilla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 03:46:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-22713</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-22713</guid>
		<description>Yep, I&#039;ve been super busy and away from writing and programming for a lot longer than I intended. I&#039;m back though with lots of new ideas. Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I've been super busy and away from writing and programming for a lot longer than I intended. I'm back though with lots of new ideas. Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-22703</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-22703</guid>
		<description>Did ya die? I liked what you were doing with this blog. Looks like you&#039;re MIA now though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did ya die? I liked what you were doing with this blog. Looks like you're MIA now though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne</title>
		<link>http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-17492</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-17492</guid>
		<description>Just checking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just checking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-11743</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-11743</guid>
		<description>The xajax replacement is still a work in progress. I definitely understand about the voodoo :). Amazingly though its quite simple to understand whats going on once you dig into the source.

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The xajax replacement is still a work in progress. I definitely understand about the voodoo <img src='http://www.phpaddiction.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Amazingly though its quite simple to understand whats going on once you dig into the source.</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulG</title>
		<link>http://www.phpaddiction.com/tags/php/xajax-and-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-11734</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpaddiction.com/?p=32#comment-11734</guid>
		<description>Xajax replacement:

I too am &#039;evolving&#039; my own dev framework and used Xajax from the start, and had planned to add moo.fx onto the front end, only because I like its small footprint and I have used it successfully before.

Xajax always seems full of stuff I don&#039;t need (maybe because I am not proficient enough to use it all or because I just dont need most of it).  Consequently it always feels like bit like Voodoo programming when I use it, but, crikey it just works very very well.

I am really interested in what you come up with in the way of an Xajax replacement that works with jQuery.

PaulG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xajax replacement:</p>
<p>I too am 'evolving' my own dev framework and used Xajax from the start, and had planned to add moo.fx onto the front end, only because I like its small footprint and I have used it successfully before.</p>
<p>Xajax always seems full of stuff I don't need (maybe because I am not proficient enough to use it all or because I just dont need most of it).  Consequently it always feels like bit like Voodoo programming when I use it, but, crikey it just works very very well.</p>
<p>I am really interested in what you come up with in the way of an Xajax replacement that works with jQuery.</p>
<p>PaulG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
